<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1291 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194446</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the respondent&#039;s petition (Arbitration Petition No.854 of 2012) and found no merit in the respondent&#039;s arguments. Acknowledging inconsistencies in the tribunal&#039;s findings, the court adjourned the claimant&#039;s petition (Arbitration Petition No.420 of 2013) for four months. The tribunal was directed to address the inconsistent findings and make a supplementary award within three months to rectify grounds for setting aside the award.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 11:00:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1291 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194446</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the respondent&#039;s petition (Arbitration Petition No.854 of 2012) and found no merit in the respondent&#039;s arguments. Acknowledging inconsistencies in the tribunal&#039;s findings, the court adjourned the claimant&#039;s petition (Arbitration Petition No.420 of 2013) for four months. The tribunal was directed to address the inconsistent findings and make a supplementary award within three months to rectify grounds for setting aside the award.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>