<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1103 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194450</link>
    <description>The appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act was dismissed by the Delhi High Court as highly belated by 975 days, citing insufficient explanation for the delay. The Income Tax department was unaware of the appeal and objections raised, attributing the delay to re-organization and a high number of defective appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 11:00:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1103 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194450</link>
      <description>The appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act was dismissed by the Delhi High Court as highly belated by 975 days, citing insufficient explanation for the delay. The Income Tax department was unaware of the appeal and objections raised, attributing the delay to re-organization and a high number of defective appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>