https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194451 The Supreme Court found that the suit filed by the father, continued by the sons as heirs, was maintainable despite the appellants being described as heirs instead of owners. The Court emphasized that the technicality did not affect the merits or jurisdiction of the case, citing relevant procedural rules. Consequently, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the decisions of the High Court and District Judge, and reinstated the trial court's decree in favor of the appellants for eviction and rent payment. en-us Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Sep 2017 11:00:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194451 The Supreme Court found that the suit filed by the father, continued by the sons as heirs, was maintainable despite the appellants being described as heirs instead of owners. The Court emphasized that the technicality did not affect the merits or jurisdiction of the case, citing relevant procedural rules. Consequently, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the decisions of the High Court and District Judge, and reinstated the trial court's decree in favor of the appellants for eviction and rent payment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194451