<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 409 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347652</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s. Mahindra &amp;amp; Mahindra, setting aside the demand of interest on the amount paid before finalization of the provisional assessment. Relying on a judgment by the Hon&#039;ble Bombay High Court, the Tribunal emphasized that interest is only payable in accordance with specific legal provisions and ruled that the circumstances of the case did not justify imposing interest. The decision was rendered on 9.8.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 06:53:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 409 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347652</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s. Mahindra &amp;amp; Mahindra, setting aside the demand of interest on the amount paid before finalization of the provisional assessment. Relying on a judgment by the Hon&#039;ble Bombay High Court, the Tribunal emphasized that interest is only payable in accordance with specific legal provisions and ruled that the circumstances of the case did not justify imposing interest. The decision was rendered on 9.8.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>