https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347650 The Tribunal upheld the findings of errors in availing ineligible CENVAT credit on rejected inputs and xerox copies of invoices. The appellant's failure to reverse CENVAT credit on rejected goods and non-payment of central excise duty on goods manufactured under job work were also noted. Penalties imposed under the CENVAT Credit Rules were reduced, considering the lack of detailed findings and excessive nature of the penalties. The Tribunal modified the penalties, reducing them to ensure justice was served, ultimately upholding the impugned order with adjustments. en-us Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Sep 2017 06:35:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347650 The Tribunal upheld the findings of errors in availing ineligible CENVAT credit on rejected inputs and xerox copies of invoices. The appellant's failure to reverse CENVAT credit on rejected goods and non-payment of central excise duty on goods manufactured under job work were also noted. Penalties imposed under the CENVAT Credit Rules were reduced, considering the lack of detailed findings and excessive nature of the penalties. The Tribunal modified the penalties, reducing them to ensure justice was served, ultimately upholding the impugned order with adjustments. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347650