https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347648 The appellant repeatedly failed to appear before the authority despite directions, leading to the dismissal of their appeal under the Central Excise Act. Various deductions claimed were disallowed as post-manufacture expenses. The appellant's dilatory tactics and non-compliance with the law resulted in the dismissal of their appeal. Legal precedents supported disallowance of claims. Both the appellant's and Revenue's appeals were dismissed, with the Revenue's appeal for interest and penalty lacking foundation. The judgment aimed to prevent further abuse of the legal process and protect Revenue's interest. en-us Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Apr 2018 11:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347648 The appellant repeatedly failed to appear before the authority despite directions, leading to the dismissal of their appeal under the Central Excise Act. Various deductions claimed were disallowed as post-manufacture expenses. The appellant's dilatory tactics and non-compliance with the law resulted in the dismissal of their appeal. Legal precedents supported disallowance of claims. Both the appellant's and Revenue's appeals were dismissed, with the Revenue's appeal for interest and penalty lacking foundation. The judgment aimed to prevent further abuse of the legal process and protect Revenue's interest. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347648