<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 393 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347636</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the writ petitions challenging assessment orders under the TNVAT Act for failure to deduct tax at source. The petitioner, a registered dealer, faced disputed assessments due to incomplete certificates from contractors. The court directed the Assessing Officer to review the petitioner&#039;s case, conduct a hearing, and issue a reasoned order to prevent double taxation. Emphasizing fair treatment, the court closed related petitions without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 06:20:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 393 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347636</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the writ petitions challenging assessment orders under the TNVAT Act for failure to deduct tax at source. The petitioner, a registered dealer, faced disputed assessments due to incomplete certificates from contractors. The court directed the Assessing Officer to review the petitioner&#039;s case, conduct a hearing, and issue a reasoned order to prevent double taxation. Emphasizing fair treatment, the court closed related petitions without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>