<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 388 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347631</link>
    <description>The Court granted relief to the Petitioners in the case challenging the Notification introducing Rule 44 A in the CGS Rules. The Court found in favor of the Petitioners, noting the discriminatory and unreasonable nature of the Notification and the potential adverse impact on them. It directed that no coercive steps be taken to recover the credit until the next hearing scheduled for 25th September 2017, allowing time for further submissions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 388 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347631</link>
      <description>The Court granted relief to the Petitioners in the case challenging the Notification introducing Rule 44 A in the CGS Rules. The Court found in favor of the Petitioners, noting the discriminatory and unreasonable nature of the Notification and the potential adverse impact on them. It directed that no coercive steps be taken to recover the credit until the next hearing scheduled for 25th September 2017, allowing time for further submissions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>