<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 81 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9834</link>
    <description>The court held that the reopening of the assessment for the assessment year 1981-82 was not justified as there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts. The impugned notice dated March 26, 1992, was quashed and set aside. The rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 81 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9834</link>
      <description>The court held that the reopening of the assessment for the assessment year 1981-82 was not justified as there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts. The impugned notice dated March 26, 1992, was quashed and set aside. The rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>