https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194433 An order issuing process or summoning an accused is treated as an intermediate or quasi-final order, so revision under Section 397 CrPC is not barred by the interlocutory order restriction. The text also states that sanction under Section 197 CrPC is not required for prosecution for cheating and allied offences, because such offences are not committed in the discharge of official duty merely because the accused is a public servant. On that basis, the contrary view on sanction was considered incorrect, and the summoning order was restored so the trial could proceed. en-us Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 May 2018 11:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194433 An order issuing process or summoning an accused is treated as an intermediate or quasi-final order, so revision under Section 397 CrPC is not barred by the interlocutory order restriction. The text also states that sanction under Section 197 CrPC is not required for prosecution for cheating and allied offences, because such offences are not committed in the discharge of official duty merely because the accused is a public servant. On that basis, the contrary view on sanction was considered incorrect, and the summoning order was restored so the trial could proceed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194433