https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194429 The court dismissed all objections raised by the defendant regarding multiple affidavits by the same witness, replication of written statements in affidavits, introduction of new documents without prior permission, documents in foreign languages without translations, and the lack of legalization or apostille on the affidavit. The court deemed these objections frivolous and allowed the plaintiff to proceed with cross-examination, ordering the defendant to pay costs for delaying the trial. The defendant was granted a final opportunity to cross-examine the witness before the Joint Registrar/Local Commissioner upon payment of Rs. 50,000 as costs. en-us Thu, 18 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Sep 2017 15:31:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194429 The court dismissed all objections raised by the defendant regarding multiple affidavits by the same witness, replication of written statements in affidavits, introduction of new documents without prior permission, documents in foreign languages without translations, and the lack of legalization or apostille on the affidavit. The court deemed these objections frivolous and allowed the plaintiff to proceed with cross-examination, ordering the defendant to pay costs for delaying the trial. The defendant was granted a final opportunity to cross-examine the witness before the Joint Registrar/Local Commissioner upon payment of Rs. 50,000 as costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194429