https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194425 The Court held that the power of attorney granted to Mr. Keeble by the banking company was valid and duly authenticated by a Notary Public, shifting the burden of proof to the defendants to challenge its authenticity. The judgment emphasized the significance of proper authentication and divided the main issue into sub-issues, focusing on the authority of the plaintiff's attorney to file the suit. The Court's decision allowed the plaintiff's application, returning the original power of attorney and directing further proceedings in the case. en-us Tue, 27 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Sep 2017 14:16:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194425 The Court held that the power of attorney granted to Mr. Keeble by the banking company was valid and duly authenticated by a Notary Public, shifting the burden of proof to the defendants to challenge its authenticity. The judgment emphasized the significance of proper authentication and divided the main issue into sub-issues, focusing on the authority of the plaintiff's attorney to file the suit. The Court's decision allowed the plaintiff's application, returning the original power of attorney and directing further proceedings in the case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 27 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194425