https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347629 The court held that the petitioner qualified as a legal representative under both the Income Tax Act and the Code of Civil Procedure, emphasizing the broad definition of legal representative. The court found that the petitioner's actions indicated involvement in the deceased's estate, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition challenging the orders of the Tax Recovery Officer and the Appellate Authority. The court declined to interfere, noting that a Writ Court can only intervene in specific circumstances, none of which were present in this case. en-us Wed, 30 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 May 2018 13:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347629 The court held that the petitioner qualified as a legal representative under both the Income Tax Act and the Code of Civil Procedure, emphasizing the broad definition of legal representative. The court found that the petitioner's actions indicated involvement in the deceased's estate, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition challenging the orders of the Tax Recovery Officer and the Appellate Authority. The court declined to interfere, noting that a Writ Court can only intervene in specific circumstances, none of which were present in this case. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 30 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347629