<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 385 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347628</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) orders, directing reconsideration of the deduction claim due to lack of evidence of excise duty payment. The appeal ruled in favor of the Department, as the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction without verification evidence was deemed unjustified under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 14:03:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 385 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347628</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) orders, directing reconsideration of the deduction claim due to lack of evidence of excise duty payment. The appeal ruled in favor of the Department, as the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction without verification evidence was deemed unjustified under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>