<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 383 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347626</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the motion seeking condonation of a 1128-day delay in challenging an order, attributing the delay to gross negligence and callousness on the part of the Revenue/Department. Despite multiple opportunities, the appeal was dismissed due to non-compliance with procedural rules, emphasizing the importance of adherence to such rules, especially by government entities. The court also criticized the Revenue officials for failing to rectify office objections promptly, highlighting the necessity of complying with procedural requirements before appeals can proceed. Ultimately, the court found the cause shown for the delay insufficient and dismissed the motion seeking condonation of delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 383 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347626</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the motion seeking condonation of a 1128-day delay in challenging an order, attributing the delay to gross negligence and callousness on the part of the Revenue/Department. Despite multiple opportunities, the appeal was dismissed due to non-compliance with procedural rules, emphasizing the importance of adherence to such rules, especially by government entities. The court also criticized the Revenue officials for failing to rectify office objections promptly, highlighting the necessity of complying with procedural requirements before appeals can proceed. Ultimately, the court found the cause shown for the delay insufficient and dismissed the motion seeking condonation of delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>