<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 369 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347612</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271B for failure to get accounts audited under section 44AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The tribunal found that the appellant provided sufficient evidence demonstrating a reasonable cause for non-compliance, specifically due to the impact of floods on the books of account. As per section 273B, the appellant was exonerated from penalties, leading to the deletion of the penalty by the ITAT.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 14:02:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 369 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347612</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271B for failure to get accounts audited under section 44AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The tribunal found that the appellant provided sufficient evidence demonstrating a reasonable cause for non-compliance, specifically due to the impact of floods on the books of account. As per section 273B, the appellant was exonerated from penalties, leading to the deletion of the penalty by the ITAT.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>