<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 363 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347606</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax and interest but set aside the penalty imposed under section 78 of the Finance Act in a case involving delayed payment of service tax and interest, non-payment of service tax for services provided to customers, and a dispute over liability to pay service tax on specific services. The appellant&#039;s delay was attributed to the customer&#039;s refusal to pay service tax, and the Tribunal found the penalty harsh and unjustified due to lack of evidence of fraud or willful suppression. The appellant was directed to pay any shortfall in the verified amount already discharged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 14:01:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 363 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347606</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax and interest but set aside the penalty imposed under section 78 of the Finance Act in a case involving delayed payment of service tax and interest, non-payment of service tax for services provided to customers, and a dispute over liability to pay service tax on specific services. The appellant&#039;s delay was attributed to the customer&#039;s refusal to pay service tax, and the Tribunal found the penalty harsh and unjustified due to lack of evidence of fraud or willful suppression. The appellant was directed to pay any shortfall in the verified amount already discharged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>