https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347605 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for service tax on provident fund and ESI collected from the service recipient. The case was disposed of based on limitation grounds as the demand period was deemed time-barred due to the absence of suppression of facts or malafide intention by the appellant. The Tribunal did not delve into the merits of the case but solely focused on the limitation aspect, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant. en-us Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Sep 2017 14:01:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347605 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for service tax on provident fund and ESI collected from the service recipient. The case was disposed of based on limitation grounds as the demand period was deemed time-barred due to the absence of suppression of facts or malafide intention by the appellant. The Tribunal did not delve into the merits of the case but solely focused on the limitation aspect, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347605