<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 360 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347603</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the rejection of refund claims by M/s Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd. for periods in 2009 and 2010, citing that the claims were filed beyond the one-year period from the date of export of goods as per Notification 17/2009-ST. Despite arguments on service tax payment delays, the tribunal emphasized the clear provision in the notification for time limit calculation. The tribunal found both appeals lacked merit and sustained the rejection of refund claims, as pronounced on 26.07.2017 by Mr. Ashok K. Arya.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 14:00:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 360 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347603</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the rejection of refund claims by M/s Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd. for periods in 2009 and 2010, citing that the claims were filed beyond the one-year period from the date of export of goods as per Notification 17/2009-ST. Despite arguments on service tax payment delays, the tribunal emphasized the clear provision in the notification for time limit calculation. The tribunal found both appeals lacked merit and sustained the rejection of refund claims, as pronounced on 26.07.2017 by Mr. Ashok K. Arya.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>