<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 126 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9828</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on the Revenue&#039;s challenges regarding the deletion of additions on account of alleged bogus purchases and in the trading account, as well as the allowance of triple shift on machinery. The Court deemed the Tribunal&#039;s findings as factual and not raising any legal questions, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 126 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9828</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on the Revenue&#039;s challenges regarding the deletion of additions on account of alleged bogus purchases and in the trading account, as well as the allowance of triple shift on machinery. The Court deemed the Tribunal&#039;s findings as factual and not raising any legal questions, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>