<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 352 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347595</link>
    <description>The court allowed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, and remanded the matter to CESTAT, Madras. The court directed CESTAT to address issues related to cross-examination within two months, answering additional legal questions in favor of the appellant. A speaking order was mandated, granting both parties sufficient opportunity. The appeal was allowed without costs, and the related Civil Miscellaneous Petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 352 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347595</link>
      <description>The court allowed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, and remanded the matter to CESTAT, Madras. The court directed CESTAT to address issues related to cross-examination within two months, answering additional legal questions in favor of the appellant. A speaking order was mandated, granting both parties sufficient opportunity. The appeal was allowed without costs, and the related Civil Miscellaneous Petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>