<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 346 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347589</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, upholding the classification of the product as branded Chewing Tobacco and confirming the applicability of the compounded levy scheme and duty demands. It found that the adjudicating authorities acted within their jurisdiction, with no legal infirmity in the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 15:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 346 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347589</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, upholding the classification of the product as branded Chewing Tobacco and confirming the applicability of the compounded levy scheme and duty demands. It found that the adjudicating authorities acted within their jurisdiction, with no legal infirmity in the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>