https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194424 The Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC based on Section 111 of the Companies Act, 1956. It held that Section 111 is not suitable for disputes requiring detailed investigation and that the remedy under this section is summary and may not be sufficient for cases needing extensive evidence. The appellant's right to maintain the civil suit was upheld, and the parties were directed to proceed before the trial court. Each party was to bear their own costs. en-us Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Sep 2017 12:30:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194424 The Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC based on Section 111 of the Companies Act, 1956. It held that Section 111 is not suitable for disputes requiring detailed investigation and that the remedy under this section is summary and may not be sufficient for cases needing extensive evidence. The appellant's right to maintain the civil suit was upheld, and the parties were directed to proceed before the trial court. Each party was to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194424