<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 5 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9825</link>
    <description>The High Court of MADRAS upheld the valuation of land at Mylapore under the Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1978, following established legal principles. The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the valuation of exempted land based on the compensation rate under the Act. However, the court left the second issue unanswered due to insufficient details in the Tribunal&#039;s order, emphasizing the importance of clarity and detailed information in legal proceedings for accurate decision-making.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 5 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9825</link>
      <description>The High Court of MADRAS upheld the valuation of land at Mylapore under the Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1978, following established legal principles. The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the valuation of exempted land based on the compensation rate under the Act. However, the court left the second issue unanswered due to insufficient details in the Tribunal&#039;s order, emphasizing the importance of clarity and detailed information in legal proceedings for accurate decision-making.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>