<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1352 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194419</link>
    <description>The court allowed the application under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with the need for convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies. The court considered the unanimous approval of the Board of Directors, consents from relevant stakeholders, and the wholly owned subsidiary status of the transferor company, concluding that convening meetings and filing a second motion petition were not required, granting directions for the Scheme to proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 10:52:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1352 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194419</link>
      <description>The court allowed the application under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with the need for convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies. The court considered the unanimous approval of the Board of Directors, consents from relevant stakeholders, and the wholly owned subsidiary status of the transferor company, concluding that convening meetings and filing a second motion petition were not required, granting directions for the Scheme to proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>