https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347565 The Bombay High Court considered a challenge to a policy circular and consequential notification alleging discrimination and infringement of the right to carry on business under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). It noted that the respondent body had statutory power under the Maharashtra Khadi and Village Industries Act, 1960 to frame policy and make regulations, subject to State Government control, and that the circular was issued within that framework without governmental objection. The Court also observed that the earlier sales tax-based controversy had lost practical effect after the GST regime came into force. The challenge failed and no further relief was maintainable. en-us Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Sep 2017 10:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347565 The Bombay High Court considered a challenge to a policy circular and consequential notification alleging discrimination and infringement of the right to carry on business under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). It noted that the respondent body had statutory power under the Maharashtra Khadi and Village Industries Act, 1960 to frame policy and make regulations, subject to State Government control, and that the circular was issued within that framework without governmental objection. The Court also observed that the earlier sales tax-based controversy had lost practical effect after the GST regime came into force. The challenge failed and no further relief was maintainable. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347565