<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1314 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194408</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court allowed the first motion application for a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, jointly moved by a transferor and transferee company. The court dispensed with the need for meetings of shareholders and creditors, as all relevant parties had consented to the scheme. Since the transferor company was a 100% subsidiary of the transferee company, no separate application was required for the transferee company. The application was granted in the stated terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 09:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1314 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194408</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court allowed the first motion application for a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, jointly moved by a transferor and transferee company. The court dispensed with the need for meetings of shareholders and creditors, as all relevant parties had consented to the scheme. Since the transferor company was a 100% subsidiary of the transferee company, no separate application was required for the transferee company. The application was granted in the stated terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>