<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1576 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194398</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by Mahindra &amp;amp; Mahindra Ltd., overturning the Order-in-Appeal that disallowed Cenvat Credit transfer from Wagholi Unit to Kanhe Unit. The Tribunal held the transfer permissible under Rule 7 of CCR 2004, disagreeing with the lack of nexus finding. The appellant was granted consequential benefits, and the pre-deposit amount was to be refunded with interest within 45 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 09:50:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1576 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194398</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by Mahindra &amp;amp; Mahindra Ltd., overturning the Order-in-Appeal that disallowed Cenvat Credit transfer from Wagholi Unit to Kanhe Unit. The Tribunal held the transfer permissible under Rule 7 of CCR 2004, disagreeing with the lack of nexus finding. The appellant was granted consequential benefits, and the pre-deposit amount was to be refunded with interest within 45 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>