<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (2) TMI 60 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194392</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the order for retrial and directed the Sessions Judge to hear the appeal, allowing the prosecution to present additional evidence to address identified deficiencies. The appellant was to be given an opportunity to rebut the additional evidence, ensuring a fair trial process. The appeal was dismissed subject to these modifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 18:34:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (2) TMI 60 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194392</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the order for retrial and directed the Sessions Judge to hear the appeal, allowing the prosecution to present additional evidence to address identified deficiencies. The appellant was to be given an opportunity to rebut the additional evidence, ensuring a fair trial process. The appeal was dismissed subject to these modifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>