<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1134 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194391</link>
    <description>Government Resolution could not override statutory recruitment rules to create a service structure that blocked trained graduate teachers in the existing cadre from consideration for promotion while allowing juniors to move ahead. The Bombay HC treated that arrangement as an anomalous hierarchy inconsistent with the recruitment framework under the Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act and the applicable 1967 Rules, and held that denial of promotional avenues raised Articles 14 and 16 concerns. Relief was limited to a direction to amend the rules to remove the anomaly and to reconsider the teachers&#039; promotional claims under the amended rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 18:25:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1134 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194391</link>
      <description>Government Resolution could not override statutory recruitment rules to create a service structure that blocked trained graduate teachers in the existing cadre from consideration for promotion while allowing juniors to move ahead. The Bombay HC treated that arrangement as an anomalous hierarchy inconsistent with the recruitment framework under the Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act and the applicable 1967 Rules, and held that denial of promotional avenues raised Articles 14 and 16 concerns. Relief was limited to a direction to amend the rules to remove the anomaly and to reconsider the teachers&#039; promotional claims under the amended rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>