<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ITAT Overstepped by Burdening Assessee to Prove Business Expenditure Validity; Case Sent Back for Review.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36237</link>
    <description>Genuineness of expenditure paid to Doctor - ITAT placed an unfair burden on the Assessee to prove that the above expense was incurred bonafide for the business purposes of the Assessee. The Assessee had placed all the relevant details thereby discharging the initial onus. Thereafter, it was open to the Revenue to prove to the contrary - Matter restored before ITAT - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 18:24:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 18:24:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ITAT Overstepped by Burdening Assessee to Prove Business Expenditure Validity; Case Sent Back for Review.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36237</link>
      <description>Genuineness of expenditure paid to Doctor - ITAT placed an unfair burden on the Assessee to prove that the above expense was incurred bonafide for the business purposes of the Assessee. The Assessee had placed all the relevant details thereby discharging the initial onus. Thereafter, it was open to the Revenue to prove to the contrary - Matter restored before ITAT - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 18:24:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>