<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 314 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347557</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially ruled in favor of the Assessee by allowing the expenses as revenue expenditure and deleting the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The Tribunal dismissed the grounds related to interest disallowance as they were not pressed during the hearing. The judgment emphasized the significance of assessing the nature of expenses and adherence to tax deduction regulations in determining the Assessee&#039;s tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2017 18:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 314 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347557</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially ruled in favor of the Assessee by allowing the expenses as revenue expenditure and deleting the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The Tribunal dismissed the grounds related to interest disallowance as they were not pressed during the hearing. The judgment emphasized the significance of assessing the nature of expenses and adherence to tax deduction regulations in determining the Assessee&#039;s tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>