<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 312 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347555</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the necessity of the AO&#039;s satisfaction before invoking Rule 8D for disallowances under section 14A. The judgment highlighted the importance of proper assessment and recording of dissatisfaction by the AO to justify disallowances, ensuring compliance with legal provisions and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 312 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347555</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the necessity of the AO&#039;s satisfaction before invoking Rule 8D for disallowances under section 14A. The judgment highlighted the importance of proper assessment and recording of dissatisfaction by the AO to justify disallowances, ensuring compliance with legal provisions and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>