<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 311 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347554</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) to decide the appeal afresh on the merits of the disallowance under Section 35(2AB), emphasizing the need to address the substantive issue rather than procedural technicalities. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, directing the assessee to submit DSIR approval and relevant evidence for examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 311 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347554</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) to decide the appeal afresh on the merits of the disallowance under Section 35(2AB), emphasizing the need to address the substantive issue rather than procedural technicalities. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, directing the assessee to submit DSIR approval and relevant evidence for examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>