<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 310 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347553</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the disallowance of business losses due to lack of evidence supporting the claim&#039;s connection to the business activity. However, it directed a re-examination of the interest expenditure disallowance issue based on new evidence presented during the appeal, allowing the claim if the loan was returned unused for business purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 18:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 310 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347553</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the disallowance of business losses due to lack of evidence supporting the claim&#039;s connection to the business activity. However, it directed a re-examination of the interest expenditure disallowance issue based on new evidence presented during the appeal, allowing the claim if the loan was returned unused for business purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>