<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 309 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347552</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, confirming only 1/3 share of Rs. 41,13,000 under section 69 of the Income Tax Act for tenancy rights. The disallowance of interest paid amounting to Rs. 3,34,000 was upheld, as well as the addition of personal expenses of Rs. 2,00,000 due to insufficient justification. The tribunal supported the decisions of the CIT(A) on all issues, ruling against the assessee. The order was pronounced on 29.08.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 16:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 309 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347552</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, confirming only 1/3 share of Rs. 41,13,000 under section 69 of the Income Tax Act for tenancy rights. The disallowance of interest paid amounting to Rs. 3,34,000 was upheld, as well as the addition of personal expenses of Rs. 2,00,000 due to insufficient justification. The tribunal supported the decisions of the CIT(A) on all issues, ruling against the assessee. The order was pronounced on 29.08.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>