<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 71 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9814</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal erred in applying the income capitalization method to value the cold storage. Instead, the appropriate method was the land and building method as per the Wealth-tax Act. The Court emphasized the importance of considering the balance-sheet figures and rejected the Tribunal&#039;s modifications. The decision favored the Revenue over the assessee, with costs not awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 71 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9814</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal erred in applying the income capitalization method to value the cold storage. Instead, the appropriate method was the land and building method as per the Wealth-tax Act. The Court emphasized the importance of considering the balance-sheet figures and rejected the Tribunal&#039;s modifications. The decision favored the Revenue over the assessee, with costs not awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>