https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194375 Anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was considered in a serious corruption matter where the Court held that its grant would be inappropriate if it impedes effective investigation. The Court emphasised that custodial interrogation becomes significant when the investigating agency shows a reasonable apprehension that an accused, by reason of position and influence, may hamper interrogation or influence witnesses. Treating such a request as ordinary post-arrest bail and ignoring investigative concerns was found erroneous. The impugned anticipatory bail order was therefore set aside. en-us Wed, 03 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Sep 2017 12:02:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194375 Anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was considered in a serious corruption matter where the Court held that its grant would be inappropriate if it impedes effective investigation. The Court emphasised that custodial interrogation becomes significant when the investigating agency shows a reasonable apprehension that an accused, by reason of position and influence, may hamper interrogation or influence witnesses. Treating such a request as ordinary post-arrest bail and ignoring investigative concerns was found erroneous. The impugned anticipatory bail order was therefore set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194375