<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 68 - UTTARANCHAL High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9808</link>
    <description>The court held that the concessional accommodation provided by the employer to its employees did not constitute a perquisite under section 17 of the Income-tax Act. It was determined that if employees paid the same rent as others in similar positions, it did not amount to a concession in rent. The court emphasized that no concession arises if the rent paid is not less than the standard rent. Relying on previous decisions, the court dismissed the appeals, confirming that no perquisite value could be added for the concessional accommodation provided to employees. The appeals were dismissed in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 68 - UTTARANCHAL High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9808</link>
      <description>The court held that the concessional accommodation provided by the employer to its employees did not constitute a perquisite under section 17 of the Income-tax Act. It was determined that if employees paid the same rent as others in similar positions, it did not amount to a concession in rent. The court emphasized that no concession arises if the rent paid is not less than the standard rent. Relying on previous decisions, the court dismissed the appeals, confirming that no perquisite value could be added for the concessional accommodation provided to employees. The appeals were dismissed in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>