https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347524 The High Court upheld the suspension order issued under the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992 against a petitioner involved in export activities. Despite errors in the order, the Court found the petitioner failed to provide a satisfactory explanation in response to a show cause notice, leading to the suspension of the importer and exporter code. The Court emphasized the importance of the unsatisfactory explanation as the basis for the suspension and dismissed the writ petition, finding no merit in the petitioner's arguments. No costs were awarded in this judgment. en-us Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Sep 2017 18:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347524 The High Court upheld the suspension order issued under the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992 against a petitioner involved in export activities. Despite errors in the order, the Court found the petitioner failed to provide a satisfactory explanation in response to a show cause notice, leading to the suspension of the importer and exporter code. The Court emphasized the importance of the unsatisfactory explanation as the basis for the suspension and dismissed the writ petition, finding no merit in the petitioner's arguments. No costs were awarded in this judgment. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347524