<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 276 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347519</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the demand for differential duty and penalties, remanding the matters to the original authority based on the direction provided. The decision was influenced by a High Court ruling in a similar case, aiming to maintain the status quo until a final decision was reached. All appeals were allowed by way of remand, considering the totality of facts and circumstances surrounding the jurisdictional issue involving Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) officers under the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 09:38:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 276 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347519</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the demand for differential duty and penalties, remanding the matters to the original authority based on the direction provided. The decision was influenced by a High Court ruling in a similar case, aiming to maintain the status quo until a final decision was reached. All appeals were allowed by way of remand, considering the totality of facts and circumstances surrounding the jurisdictional issue involving Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) officers under the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>