https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194365 The court dismissed the excise appeal challenging the Tribunal's order due to a delay of 504 days in filing the appeal. The appellant's request for condonation of delay under section 5 of the Limitation Act was rejected as the court found the explanation unsatisfactory, particularly given the evasion of service tax by the cable network service provider. The court emphasized the importance of timely appeals, especially in cases involving tax evasion, and highlighted the necessity of compliance with procedural requirements in excise appeals under the Central Excise Act, 1944. en-us Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Sep 2017 18:11:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194365 The court dismissed the excise appeal challenging the Tribunal's order due to a delay of 504 days in filing the appeal. The appellant's request for condonation of delay under section 5 of the Limitation Act was rejected as the court found the explanation unsatisfactory, particularly given the evasion of service tax by the cable network service provider. The court emphasized the importance of timely appeals, especially in cases involving tax evasion, and highlighted the necessity of compliance with procedural requirements in excise appeals under the Central Excise Act, 1944. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194365