https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194355 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding remission of duty on stolen goods, upholding the rejection of the remission application by the Commissioner, Central Excise, Jaipur. The Tribunal ruled that theft does not qualify as an unavoidable accident under Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, emphasizing that theft is not a natural cause or accident as defined in legal terms. Citing precedent and legal interpretations, the Tribunal affirmed that theft does not fall within the scope of remission as specified in the Central Excise Rules, 2002. en-us Tue, 23 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Sep 2017 18:11:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194355 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding remission of duty on stolen goods, upholding the rejection of the remission application by the Commissioner, Central Excise, Jaipur. The Tribunal ruled that theft does not qualify as an unavoidable accident under Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, emphasizing that theft is not a natural cause or accident as defined in legal terms. Citing precedent and legal interpretations, the Tribunal affirmed that theft does not fall within the scope of remission as specified in the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 23 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194355