https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194361 A suit seeking to restrain invocation of arbitration was held barred because objections to compliance with the staged dispute-resolution procedure in the arbitration clause belonged to the arbitration process itself. The Court applied the competence-competence principle and Section 5 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and held that such issues are for the arbitral tribunal, not the civil court. It also noted that the plaintiff had effective remedies before the tribunal and under the Act. On that basis, the plaint was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as barred by law. en-us Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Sep 2017 18:11:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194361 A suit seeking to restrain invocation of arbitration was held barred because objections to compliance with the staged dispute-resolution procedure in the arbitration clause belonged to the arbitration process itself. The Court applied the competence-competence principle and Section 5 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and held that such issues are for the arbitral tribunal, not the civil court. It also noted that the plaintiff had effective remedies before the tribunal and under the Act. On that basis, the plaint was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as barred by law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194361