<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 255 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347498</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court discharged the Senior Counsel appointed as Amicus Curiae after he sought release from assisting the respondent, who was unwilling to file the unconditional affidavit of apology earlier contemplated. In the contempt proceedings arising from a show cause notice under Section 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the Court noted that the respondent declined to withdraw all allegations and sought more time to complete submissions on the basis of ill health. Although the Court found the conduct unreasonable and dilatory, it granted a final adjournment in the interest of justice and directed that no further adjournment would be allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 18:10:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 255 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347498</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court discharged the Senior Counsel appointed as Amicus Curiae after he sought release from assisting the respondent, who was unwilling to file the unconditional affidavit of apology earlier contemplated. In the contempt proceedings arising from a show cause notice under Section 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the Court noted that the respondent declined to withdraw all allegations and sought more time to complete submissions on the basis of ill health. Although the Court found the conduct unreasonable and dilatory, it granted a final adjournment in the interest of justice and directed that no further adjournment would be allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>