<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 410 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194350</link>
    <description>Compassionate appointment under the applicable aided-institution regulations is a limited exception to regular recruitment and must not displace the rights of other eligible candidates or distort the cadre structure. The proper construction required appointment against a Class III post only where such a vacancy existed; if no Class III post was available in the institution or elsewhere in the district, the dependent could be appointed on a Class IV post in the concerned institution, with a supernumerary Class IV post created for that purpose. A direction to create a supernumerary Class III post was therefore unsustainable, and the entitlement was confined to the lower cadre.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 18:02:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 410 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194350</link>
      <description>Compassionate appointment under the applicable aided-institution regulations is a limited exception to regular recruitment and must not displace the rights of other eligible candidates or distort the cadre structure. The proper construction required appointment against a Class III post only where such a vacancy existed; if no Class III post was available in the institution or elsewhere in the district, the dependent could be appointed on a Class IV post in the concerned institution, with a supernumerary Class IV post created for that purpose. A direction to create a supernumerary Class III post was therefore unsustainable, and the entitlement was confined to the lower cadre.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>