https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194344 In a suit by an assignee, the assignment itself was treated as part of the cause of action because it is a necessary fact the plaintiff must prove to establish title and obtain relief. On that basis, an assignment executed in Calcutta was held to support jurisdiction under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent. The Court also held that leave already granted under Clause 12 should not be revoked merely on allegations of inconvenience, mala fides, or balance of convenience where the assignment appeared bona fide, no decisive prejudice was shown, and revocation would create a serious limitation risk. en-us Tue, 20 Feb 1945 00:00:00 +0630 Tue, 05 Sep 2017 17:25:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194344 In a suit by an assignee, the assignment itself was treated as part of the cause of action because it is a necessary fact the plaintiff must prove to establish title and obtain relief. On that basis, an assignment executed in Calcutta was held to support jurisdiction under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent. The Court also held that leave already granted under Clause 12 should not be revoked merely on allegations of inconvenience, mala fides, or balance of convenience where the assignment appeared bona fide, no decisive prejudice was shown, and revocation would create a serious limitation risk. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Feb 1945 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194344