<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 242 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347485</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not justified as the issue was debatable and pending before the Supreme Court. The ITAT allowed the appeals, deleted the penalties, and dismissed the stay applications as infructuous. The decision was pronounced on 31/08/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 17:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 242 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347485</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not justified as the issue was debatable and pending before the Supreme Court. The ITAT allowed the appeals, deleted the penalties, and dismissed the stay applications as infructuous. The decision was pronounced on 31/08/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>