<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1322 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194340</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the issue was already covered against the Revenue by its earlier ruling in Oracle Software India Ltd. As the same legal position governed the dispute, the Court found no merit in the Revenue&#039;s challenge and dismissed the appeal. The text reflects reliance on binding precedent rather than any fresh determination of the underlying tax issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 16:42:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1322 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194340</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the issue was already covered against the Revenue by its earlier ruling in Oracle Software India Ltd. As the same legal position governed the dispute, the Court found no merit in the Revenue&#039;s challenge and dismissed the appeal. The text reflects reliance on binding precedent rather than any fresh determination of the underlying tax issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>