<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 239 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347482</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the aggregated approach for benchmarking international transactions but directed re-characterization of the appellant&#039;s functions and a fresh search for comparables. The issue of additional salary expenses was remanded for verification, while other unargued grounds were dismissed. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 16:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 239 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347482</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the aggregated approach for benchmarking international transactions but directed re-characterization of the appellant&#039;s functions and a fresh search for comparables. The issue of additional salary expenses was remanded for verification, while other unargued grounds were dismissed. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>